The tax sonnet is live now at Topology Magazine, here.
Enjoy! (Definitely you will enjoy this poem more than you enjoy paying taxes. Seriously.)
And there's "Fallen to Witches" at Mithila Review, here.
I've been writing witch poems this year, after learning that both of my parents have ancestors who were jailed during the Salem Witch Trials.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Sunday, July 31, 2016
Grit and the Art of Deliberate Practice
Today I’ve been reading Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance by Angela Duckworth. It’s
a terrific book, and one I suspect I’ll hark back to because there are a lot of
good ideas here. She talks about the sociological and psychological research
around overcoming defeat and disappointment, as well as specific real-world
examples of people who show grit in their lives. As a writer who regularly gets
rejected, developing that resilience is something for which I’m striving.
One aspect to grit that particularly struck me is the idea
of deliberate practice. We’re all
pretty clear on the way that time spent in an activity leads to better results.
Any writer will tell you that it’s common to run into people who would love to
be writers but can never manage to make the time to sit down and, you know, write something. But in Grit, Angela Duckworth takes the concept
further. She points out that it’s not enough to grind out the hours. Really
successful people, the ones who overcome the inevitable plateaus in life,
engage in what she calls deliberate practice. They seek to improve their
performance by setting goals that will test their limits and stretch their skills, by focusing on
specific areas that need improvement, and (yes) putting in the hard work that
will make meeting those goals possible.
She points out that, while that hard work may not be fun,
those with grit take pleasure in their accomplishments, and find joy in the
process as it helps them improve. So tonight, I’m thinking about deliberate
practice as it applies to the art and craft of writing, and seeking ways to put
those ideas to work in my own stories.
If you’re a writer who’s made a conscious effort to practice
deliberately, what techniques did you use? Did you have a mentor, take a class
or join a workshop? Has your study been more self-directed? How did you mesh
this practice with your writing?
In line with this, I’ve been thinking about one specific
thing I’d like to improve in my own stories. (This is not to say that this is
the only shortcoming I have; only that this is the one I think is currently
holding me back the most.) My writing needs to be more emotional, or rather,
there needs to be a stronger emotional thread in the story, and a
stronger emotional connection for the reader. So I’m going to read a couple
books that address that particular issue, and I’m going to read stories and
think about how their authors develop that emotional resonance. Until I can
understand what gives me a strong emotional response as a reader, I won’t be
able to translate that into my own fiction. I shy away from emotion too much,
in life and in art, and that won’t work.
What about you? What’s your deliberate practice? Where are
you going next, and how will you make it happen?
Sunday, July 3, 2016
Some thoughts on goal-setting for writers
I was putting together my goals for July, and found myself
thinking back to earlier days and the way my goal setting has changed—and stayed
the same—throughout my years as a writer. Everybody works differently, but I
suspect there are few writers who succeed without setting any goals. And I have
a suspicion that setting the wrong kinds of goals can be disastrous as well.
Whether the goal-setter is thinking too big or too small, the way we approach
progress and mileposts can hamper us. Or inspire, on the other hand, if we do
it wisely.
First of all, it’s good to have an idea of what motivates
you and gets your creative juices flowing. The sad fact is, there may be long
stretches of time where you’re not receiving a lot of positive feedback and
outside rewards for your hard work. So figure out if a special meal, a night
out with friends, or a new book might give you some much-needed joy. And then
think about ways to earn that enticing reward.
Dorothy is absolutely right--but the wait can be excruciating
Break it down
The rough draft of your 300,000 word fantasy opus is
probably not going to sell right off. And even if it did, you still have to
write the damn thing first. You’ve got your maps, and the ominous
prophecy-thingy, but now what? Shockingly, opuses don’t get written in one
sitting. And you’re going to struggle.
So maybe your goal list should include something other than 1) Write epic fantasy novel. Maybe you
need to figure out how to get there.
Figuring out the best approach is a learning process. Maybe
you’ll outline thoroughly and break it down into scenes. Maybe you’ll calculate
how long you’d like it to be and plot the major turning points and where they’ll
need to occur. Maybe you’ll be pantsing the whole way and set a daily or weekly
word goal. Be prepared for the trial and error you’ll need to work out your
best method. Remember: everyone finds themselves stuck from time to time. It’s
not a sign of failure, so much as an indication that you need to rethink the
process.
Best rest stop ever, or best rest stop OF ALL TIME?
Whatever path you take, set smaller goals that mark out the
way. Just like you wouldn’t drive from Boston to San Francisco in one marathon
session, you’ll need figurative hotels and rest stops on the story trail, too.
Treat yourself when you’ve set the hook in the opening chapter, or when you’ve
finally slogged through the flabby middle part of the story and see the end in
sight.
Branch out
When I started, the general advice was to begin with short
fiction and break into the market that way before trying to sell a novel. That
advice wasn’t terribly helpful then, and is even less so now, but there’s a kernel
of value. You may have a natural form that works best for you—I’ve been most successful with poetry
so far, and my stories all want to turn into novels—but it’s not wise to limit
yourself to only one thing, however comfortable that feels.
Learning to write better poetry has taught me about rhythm
and pattern in language, about finding images that are vivid and unique, about
compressing the necessary details and deleting what doesn’t move the piece
forward. Working on short fiction has made me think about satisfying beginnings
and endings, and how to convey emotion to the reader in a shorter space. And
longer pieces have their own needs and structural concerns, calling for much
deeper thinking on matters of theme and plot and characterization. All of those
things are valuable parts of a writer’s toolkit. Even if poetry requires a
different mindset than fiction (like thinking in a different language, as one
writer puts it), I can use what I’ve learned in every aspect of writing.
There’s value in trying different genres as well. Too often
we find ourselves locked into one particular type of story, but taking the risk
of writing in a different field can bring new life to all of a writer’s work. Anyone
who reads voraciously can think of favorite authors whose work grew stale over
the years, as they trod the same ground again and again. So don’t be afraid to
experiment. Write in a point of view you’ve never tried before, switch to a
different verb tense, or even give that genre mash-up you’ve been dreaming of a
shot.
In other words, don’t forget to have fun. Otherwise, you
might as well be making widgets in a gloomy factory.
Build it up
The longer I write, the more clearly I see how much I still
have to learn. There are ideas I have that I can’t work on yet, because I just
don’t have the knowledge and experience to convey what’s in my mind and heart.
(I know some of you are saying that I should try anyway—and you’re right, to a
point. There’s value in taking risks, but there’s also value in gaining an
awareness of the gaps in your skills and exercising patience.)
So one of the things I’m working on consciously (and
semi-conscientiously) right now is to gain a better understanding of what makes
good writing in various areas, to study writers who are good and work on
incorporating those skills into my own toolkit. To accomplish that, I’ve set
goals to read anthologies and collections and think about the stories that seem
particularly effective. I’m critiquing regularly for other people, too. In the
past, I’ve worked as a slush reader, and that was an enlightening experience.
You know how editors will say, “I don’t ever want to see stories with X
[vampires, zombies, sappy love stories]!” There’s a damn good reason for that. And
you will understand, when you’ve read through every possible permutation of
boring, sloppy, unimaginative vampire story that your fellow writers can come
up with.
When I was an editor, it was stories about people losing it and killing their spouses. There's a lot of spousal rage out there. Seriously.
In short, there are a myriad ways in which you can build and
expand your writer’s toolkit. One of the terrifying things about this work is
that there’s so much more to learn. But that’s also the wonderful thing about
it, too. I will never reach a point where I know everything about writing. As
long as I want to, as long as I work at it, there’s always another mountain to
conquer.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Reading fees: Not even once.
Posting this makes me feel a little like a cranky Luddite, but this new trend of magazines charging reading fees for submissions is really terrible. I get why contests do it--it's why I don't enter contests, but there has to be some pool from which to draw the prize money. But regular publications? No no NO.
Here's the thing: writers generally write on spec. At least that's the case for beginners, and for a lot of the rest of us who don't have a multi-book contract. We have to put in a whole heck of a lot of work, up front, with no guarantee of payment. That's the burden of risk the creator bears in the market.
Editors and publishers have to sort through all the not-awesome submissions to find the ones that are both wonderfully written, and fitting for the publication. Slogging through the slush pile is not the most fun part of editing (and I say this as a former slush-pile-slogger) but that's part of the burden of risk the publisher bears in the market.
When a publisher charges a writer to read their work, that's shifting more of the burden of risk onto the writer, who is already bearing enough by working without any upfront pay. It's a crappy thing to do, and unprofessional. STOP IT.
And writers, do not pay these fees. Revenues should flow to publishers from advertisements, crowdfunding, and subscriptions. Not from the writers. The implication is that somehow you'll get a more fair read by paying for the privilege, but I wouldn't count on it. If you want to sink more money into your craft, take a class. Go to a convention and network. Hire an editor and a cover artist and publish your own work. But don't pay someone to do their job. If they can't make it work without your fees, they're probably not ready for the big leagues anyway.
This crab with a plastic fork conveys my feelings.
Here's the thing: writers generally write on spec. At least that's the case for beginners, and for a lot of the rest of us who don't have a multi-book contract. We have to put in a whole heck of a lot of work, up front, with no guarantee of payment. That's the burden of risk the creator bears in the market.
Editors and publishers have to sort through all the not-awesome submissions to find the ones that are both wonderfully written, and fitting for the publication. Slogging through the slush pile is not the most fun part of editing (and I say this as a former slush-pile-slogger) but that's part of the burden of risk the publisher bears in the market.
When a publisher charges a writer to read their work, that's shifting more of the burden of risk onto the writer, who is already bearing enough by working without any upfront pay. It's a crappy thing to do, and unprofessional. STOP IT.
And writers, do not pay these fees. Revenues should flow to publishers from advertisements, crowdfunding, and subscriptions. Not from the writers. The implication is that somehow you'll get a more fair read by paying for the privilege, but I wouldn't count on it. If you want to sink more money into your craft, take a class. Go to a convention and network. Hire an editor and a cover artist and publish your own work. But don't pay someone to do their job. If they can't make it work without your fees, they're probably not ready for the big leagues anyway.
Monday, June 6, 2016
Dear Short Story:
Oh shiny new short story, I'm begging you: Please, please, please do not turn into another novel.
I can't juggle another novel right now, no matter how adorable your characters are.
Love,
The Writer
I can't juggle another novel right now, no matter how adorable your characters are.
Love,
The Writer
Picture courtesy of my sister Margaret Bibber, who arms crabs in her spare time.
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
100 Days of Writing
I feel sort of like an addict, telling you that today is the 100th straight in which I have written something new. (Maybe I am a laziness addict. Sometimes just sitting down for the time it takes to write a page of . . . something . . . feels like a huge battle.)
Here's the thing, though: while writing every day works for me, it may not work for you. It's important that we have this discussion, because I don't want anyone to feel like they're Doing It Wrong. That's something that gets slung around a lot in the writing world, and I've learned to be wary of people who try to tell me there's One True Way of creating. That, my friends, is a load of crap.
For me, it's important to write every day--at this point in time--for a couple of reasons. One, which I consider the most important of all, is that when I write, I'm happier. Sometimes the good feeling arises just from sitting at the computer and working on a cool scene or a poem that's been gnawing at my brain. Other times, it's glorious to put in the time and feel victorious over my lower nature. Either way, it's healing. Times when I'm not writing are times when I'm not at my best.
Second, putting the time in to hone my craft is one sure way I know of to get better at it. And my mind is more focused when I make a point of showing up. I have a lot to learn, and the more I work at writing, the clearer my shortcomings appear. There are other elements to learning: reading widely and thoughtfully, doing research, revising, talking about writing with more knowledgeable people. But none of those can substitute for making words of my own.
I don't work the same project every day, but if I have two or three or four going, of different lengths and styles. A blog post counts as new words. A poem counts as new words. A page of fiction counts, but no more or less than the others. When I lose focus on one project, or run into the Brick Wall of What the Hell Happens Next, the lizard hind brain has already been working on some other thing that needs telling. Or maybe it's worked out what I did wrong the last time I ran into a roadblock.
That's my process. It's what works for me. Your process may be different. Hell, my process will probably change if I ever have a non-self-imposed deadline. And that's okay. I expect at some point in the future, I'll be sane enough that writing every day will seem less important. But for now, there's a deep personal significance in letting the words out any-which-way and getting comfortable with that.
Daniel Jose Older wrote this really great post on Seven Scribes, talking about how wrong the 'write every day' advice can be. I love the point he makes right in the title, that in order to write, we have to forgive ourselves, let go of the shame that can hold us back and even destroy us. It's important advice, and you should read it, because Older says it better than I can.
Whatever form your shame takes, however it tries to take your voice, find the way to let it go. I can't tell you how to do that, but hopefully you'll forgive me for being excited that I'm learning to show shame the door--and write like my life depends on it.
Here's the thing, though: while writing every day works for me, it may not work for you. It's important that we have this discussion, because I don't want anyone to feel like they're Doing It Wrong. That's something that gets slung around a lot in the writing world, and I've learned to be wary of people who try to tell me there's One True Way of creating. That, my friends, is a load of crap.
For me, it's important to write every day--at this point in time--for a couple of reasons. One, which I consider the most important of all, is that when I write, I'm happier. Sometimes the good feeling arises just from sitting at the computer and working on a cool scene or a poem that's been gnawing at my brain. Other times, it's glorious to put in the time and feel victorious over my lower nature. Either way, it's healing. Times when I'm not writing are times when I'm not at my best.
The baby alpacas want you to be happy. Listen to the baby alpacas. Do what they tell you.
Second, putting the time in to hone my craft is one sure way I know of to get better at it. And my mind is more focused when I make a point of showing up. I have a lot to learn, and the more I work at writing, the clearer my shortcomings appear. There are other elements to learning: reading widely and thoughtfully, doing research, revising, talking about writing with more knowledgeable people. But none of those can substitute for making words of my own.
I don't work the same project every day, but if I have two or three or four going, of different lengths and styles. A blog post counts as new words. A poem counts as new words. A page of fiction counts, but no more or less than the others. When I lose focus on one project, or run into the Brick Wall of What the Hell Happens Next, the lizard hind brain has already been working on some other thing that needs telling. Or maybe it's worked out what I did wrong the last time I ran into a roadblock.
That's my process. It's what works for me. Your process may be different. Hell, my process will probably change if I ever have a non-self-imposed deadline. And that's okay. I expect at some point in the future, I'll be sane enough that writing every day will seem less important. But for now, there's a deep personal significance in letting the words out any-which-way and getting comfortable with that.
Daniel Jose Older wrote this really great post on Seven Scribes, talking about how wrong the 'write every day' advice can be. I love the point he makes right in the title, that in order to write, we have to forgive ourselves, let go of the shame that can hold us back and even destroy us. It's important advice, and you should read it, because Older says it better than I can.
Whatever form your shame takes, however it tries to take your voice, find the way to let it go. I can't tell you how to do that, but hopefully you'll forgive me for being excited that I'm learning to show shame the door--and write like my life depends on it.
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
A question of strength
Today marks the 86th straight day in which I’ve
done some rough draft work. Sometimes just a poem, other days I’ve written as
much as 2000 words. The important thing for me right now is the act of showing
up. When I do that, my moods are more even and I tend to be more creative
overall. It’s the kind of streak that won’t last forever, but it reminds me why
taking the time to commit to my work is important.
I'm kind of more in the blue circle right now.
That being said, I’m struggling with the work—particularly the
part where I’m supposed to focus on rewriting and making the words sing, and
the part where I need to send stuff out and collect rejections, and the part
where I should probably make a list of agents and polish the novel query like I’ve
been meaning to do for over a year now.
I’m really reluctant about that part, almost on a molecular
level. Bit by bit the urge is returning, because I do want to share my work
with others. That being said, writing to get published was a huge factor in the
massive depression from which I’m emerging, which makes me leery of the risks
involved. Not just rejection, though that’s never enjoyable, but the sense of futility
and invisibility that have dogged me.
Let's face it, none of us will ever be as awesome as Helen Mirren and Judi Dench.
So here’s what I’m wondering, my fellow creative types: Do
you know how to distinguish between legitimate self-care and recalcitrant
foot-dragging? How do you tell them apart? Have you found a way to give yourself
the courage to fail, while still making a safe space for the fragile parts of
your soul?
I could really use your advice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)